Still under investigation:
\textbf{Muon : tau}
\textbf{Top : charm}
pow(173.07 / (4.18/3), 0.5) * (9./25) * (4./16)
= 0.9982 (1 / 1.00183)
pow(173.07 / (4.18/3), 0.5) * golden_mean_ratio / 18
= 0.9970 (1 / 1.00305)
\textbf{Muon : proton}
pow(0.106 / .938, 0.5) * (9./25) * (25/3.)
= 1.00686
\textbf{Top : proton}
pow(173.07 / .938, 0.5) * (9./25) * (11./54)
= 0.9961 (1 / 1.00390)
\textbf{Bottom : proton}
pow((4.18/3) / .938, 0.5) * (9./25) * (20.5/9)
= 0.99940 (1/1.00060)
pow((4.18/3) / .938, 0.5) * pow(golden_mean_ratio, 0.5) / (14/9.)
= 1.00338
\textbf{Proton : charm}
pow((1.29*2/3) / .938, 0.5) * (9./25) * (26./9)
= 0.9958 (1/1.00420)
\textbf{Proton : strange}
pow((0.09/3) / .938, 0.5) * (9./25) * 15.5
= 0.99791 (1/1.0021)
\textbf{Up : electron}
pow((4.79/3)/0.511, 0.5)* (9./25) * (11./7)
= 0.999986 (1/1.000014)
pow((4.79/3)/0.511, 0.5)*(math.pi/2)*9/25
= 0.99958 (1/1.0004)
\textbf{Down : electron}
pow((2.01*2/3) / 0.511, 0.5) * (25/9.) * (2/9.)
= 0.99960
pow((2.01*2/3) / 0.511, 0.5)
= golden_mean_ratio
\textbf{Up : down}
pow((4.79/3) / (2.01*2/3), 0.5) = 11/12
\textbf{Table of Quark : Proton ratios}
From the above data it's clear that there's a definite correlation
(muon being the exception)
Quark Root2 Mass Ratio T V T-charge V-charge
Muon 1/25 * 450/6 ( 75.0 ) 9 0 +1 0
Strange 1/25 * 837/6 (139.5 ) 7 2 -1/3 -2/3
Charm 1/25 * 156/6 ( 26.0 ) 6 3 +2/3 +1/3
Proton 1/25 * 150/6 ( 25.0 ) 5 4 +1 0
Bottom 1/25 * 123/6 ( 20.5 ) 3 6 -1/3 -2/3
Top 1/25 * 11/6 ( 1.833) 2 7 +2/3 -1/3
\textit{Table 2: Quark:proton ratios}
x0 = pow(75, 0.5)
= 8.660
x1 = pow(139.5, 0.5)
= 11.811
x2 = pow(26.0, 0.5)
= 5.099
x3 = pow(25, 0.5)
= 5.0
x4 = pow(20.5, 0.5)
= 4.527
x5 = pow(1.833333333333333, 0.5)
= 1.354
x0/x1 = 44/60
x1/x2 = 60./26
x2/x3 = 60./59
x3/x4 = 60./54
x4/x5 = 60./18
x0/x3 = 86.6 /50 (1.73) 86.6
x1/x3 = 116 /50 (2.32) 116
x2/x3 = 51 /50 (1.02) x2 102
x3/x3 = 50 /50 (1.00) 50
x4/x3 = 45 /50 (0.90) x2 45
x5/x3 = 13.54/50 (0.2708) 27
TODO: investigate further