Still under investigation:
\textbf{Muon : tau} \textbf{Top : charm} pow(173.07 / (4.18/3), 0.5) * (9./25) * (4./16) = 0.9982 (1 / 1.00183) pow(173.07 / (4.18/3), 0.5) * golden_mean_ratio / 18 = 0.9970 (1 / 1.00305) \textbf{Muon : proton} pow(0.106 / .938, 0.5) * (9./25) * (25/3.) = 1.00686 \textbf{Top : proton} pow(173.07 / .938, 0.5) * (9./25) * (11./54) = 0.9961 (1 / 1.00390) \textbf{Bottom : proton} pow((4.18/3) / .938, 0.5) * (9./25) * (20.5/9) = 0.99940 (1/1.00060) pow((4.18/3) / .938, 0.5) * pow(golden_mean_ratio, 0.5) / (14/9.) = 1.00338 \textbf{Proton : charm} pow((1.29*2/3) / .938, 0.5) * (9./25) * (26./9) = 0.9958 (1/1.00420) \textbf{Proton : strange} pow((0.09/3) / .938, 0.5) * (9./25) * 15.5 = 0.99791 (1/1.0021) \textbf{Up : electron} pow((4.79/3)/0.511, 0.5)* (9./25) * (11./7) = 0.999986 (1/1.000014) pow((4.79/3)/0.511, 0.5)*(math.pi/2)*9/25 = 0.99958 (1/1.0004) \textbf{Down : electron} pow((2.01*2/3) / 0.511, 0.5) * (25/9.) * (2/9.) = 0.99960 pow((2.01*2/3) / 0.511, 0.5) = golden_mean_ratio \textbf{Up : down} pow((4.79/3) / (2.01*2/3), 0.5) = 11/12 \textbf{Table of Quark : Proton ratios} From the above data it's clear that there's a definite correlation (muon being the exception) Quark Root2 Mass Ratio T V T-charge V-charge Muon 1/25 * 450/6 ( 75.0 ) 9 0 +1 0 Strange 1/25 * 837/6 (139.5 ) 7 2 -1/3 -2/3 Charm 1/25 * 156/6 ( 26.0 ) 6 3 +2/3 +1/3 Proton 1/25 * 150/6 ( 25.0 ) 5 4 +1 0 Bottom 1/25 * 123/6 ( 20.5 ) 3 6 -1/3 -2/3 Top 1/25 * 11/6 ( 1.833) 2 7 +2/3 -1/3 \textit{Table 2: Quark:proton ratios} x0 = pow(75, 0.5) = 8.660 x1 = pow(139.5, 0.5) = 11.811 x2 = pow(26.0, 0.5) = 5.099 x3 = pow(25, 0.5) = 5.0 x4 = pow(20.5, 0.5) = 4.527 x5 = pow(1.833333333333333, 0.5) = 1.354 x0/x1 = 44/60 x1/x2 = 60./26 x2/x3 = 60./59 x3/x4 = 60./54 x4/x5 = 60./18 x0/x3 = 86.6 /50 (1.73) 86.6 x1/x3 = 116 /50 (2.32) 116 x2/x3 = 51 /50 (1.02) x2 102 x3/x3 = 50 /50 (1.00) 50 x4/x3 = 45 /50 (0.90) x2 45 x5/x3 = 13.54/50 (0.2708) 27 TODO: investigate further