Neutron and neutrino V charge

The real reason for raising the anomaly of the neutron is to point out the fact that a neutron has -1V charge and the neutrino +1V.

We note above that the neutron and the neutrino have opposing and equal unit charge. We note also that the electron and the proton have opposing and equal unit charge. Noted also is the fact that electrons orbit protons. Logically, therefore, is there any reason why neutrinos should not orbit neutrinos? There is no such reason to consider otherwise, with the exception perhaps that if V charge is actually a complex number (as hypothesised earlier) the evident interactions in 3 dimensions (projected or otherwise) may not conform to the same rules as observed (or better: inferred) for electron-proton interaction.

However, without being able to say either way, the thought experiment may as well be continued through to its logical conclusion. Namely, that if neutrinos do in fact orbit neutrons, there are a number of startling implications:

1. that the recorded (measured) mass of a neutron could well also include an orbiting neutrino.

2. that if neutrinos orbit neutrons, then atoms not only have electron shells but they would also have corresponding neutrino shells, with those shells presumably mirroring the exact same sorts of configurations as electrons in orbit around protons.

3. that it could be considered that a neutron, with an associated orbital neutrino, is itself an atom (of a rather unusual type) in the same way that a proton with its associated orbital electron is an atom of hydrogen.

4. that, as reasoned in the section above, there is a logical explanation as to why the W- Boson is used as the medium of transition in neutron decay (as opposed to the much shorter-distance virtual pions, aka "gluons").

Each of these needs some careful consideration.

Regarding neutron mass: given that the recorded (measured, inferred) mass of a neutron is around the same as the sum total mass of a proton plus an electron, this is not as unreasonable a logical inference as it first sounds. (Recall also that the "zero" mass of a neutrino is also considered questionable: it could be zero "real" mass with a complex component that is hard to interact with yet present and equal to that of an electron's "real" mass (just as an electron's complex mass component is zero, given that an electron has zero V charge). However, also recall that the assignment of "real" and "complex" to T and V charges is analogous, and not yet actually proven: the two words are merely used as a convenient moniker).

Regarding the possibility of neutrino shells: this is itself an area worthy of an entire study of its own. The implications for the whole of chemistry are simply too enormous to cover in this paper, especially given that there are clearly interactions between the T and V matter types that would have to be taken into account.